The thought of opening the GLP issue did give me a slight headache. I
thought the GLP thing was worth mentioning since there was some
evidence you could hit planes with it. I was not sure about the
power. This is as good a place any to see if there was some technical
feedback. If there is no problem then it was worth mentioning since
TAC is mildly politically active. Since our law makers are
technically incompetent they might need some urging one way or the
other. I try not to mention anything about generators ("Excuse me
while I reload"?) , FPOA turf wars, technical questions about how
people make amazing photos, batteries (unless mine sounds like it is
going to explode), and red screens (although I still think this is a
good topic since I think lots of people don't make them correctly and
people are trying to be cautious about *your* night vision).
:)
-Sean
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:58:14 -0700, Jamie Dillon <jamie_dillon@No-Spam> wrote:
> Peak went right along without an uproar. And here Sean (who really
> should know better, being a quick chap) starts in on yes the dreaded
> GLP's. Only one reply. Nice.
>
Received on Wed Sep 29 15:31:33 2004