RE: OT: One More Time ... Prof. Alan Guth at Stanford MondayNight

From: Bob Czerwinski (bczerwin@No-Spam)
Date: Wed Jan 29 2003 - 13:09:20 MST

  • Next message: Bob Czerwinski: "RE: OT: One More Time ... Prof. Alan Guth at Stanford MondayNight"

    Randy "ZZ" Muller wrote:
    > I would just point out that it sounds like some of the material
    > presented was more of the nature of mathematical speculation, rather
    > than established physical theory, and that much of the material can
    > probably never be proved to exist or not to exist. That doesn't mean
    > it's not fun to hear or discuss, of course.

    What Randy says is true. The creation of certain particles requires an
    environment we cannot recreate in the lab. Prof. Guth brought this up
    himself, but also noted that many particles were predicted lonnng before
    they were "discovered," the neutrino being one. The particles with
    which he deals mathematically are also used by countless others, and are
    generally accepted by all particle physicists; the math is just too
    good!

    By the way, someone asked Prof. Guth what the "best" current candidates
    were for dark matter. He said there were quite a few, and included the
    neutrino (for "hot" dark matter) and axions through supersymmetric
    particles to cryptons (for "cold" dark matter). Some candidates can be
    verified or eliminated through particle experiments, while candidates
    such as axions and cryptons are welllll beyone the reach of
    accelerators. A lot of headway is being made here. Looks like the next
    decade of accelerator experiments may determine if the leading
    candidates - like the heavy "superpartners" of the photon - are really
    the ones. What's needed is a wee bit of time on the Large Hadron
    Collider (LHC) under construction at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. Too
    bad it doesn't get going 'til 2007!

    As far as dark energy goes, Prof. Guth noted that we haven't got a clue.
    Tons of theories out there, but all speculation. He said the secret to
    its nature probably lies with a better understanding of quantum gravity.
    Anybody have the complete quantum theory of gravity in their back
    pocket? <grin>

    Today it looks like the universe is 1-2% baryonic matter (i.e.,
    neutrons, protons, etc.), about 30% dark matter and about 70% dark
    energy. Obviously we've got a lonnng way to go with all this, boys and
    girls!

    ...Bob...
    Bob Czerwinski



    The Astronomy Connection -- Mailing List Archives