Re: Bottom Line? (was Re: Long response to "TAC general BA astro or...")

From: P T Chambers (ptchamb@No-Spam)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2001 - 12:11:43 MST

  • Next message: RichardN22@No-Spam: "Re: Long response to "TAC general BA astro or...""

    I have been trying to stay out of this but:

    THIS IS REDICULOUS!!!

    There has been more traffic about WHAT SHOULD BE ON THE LIST than there IS
    ON THE LIST.

    At a dark site, I dont see any of this antagonistic behavior. Everyone
    appreciates the hobby and tries to accomodate everyone else.

    So, why are these threads becomeing so antagonistic.

    I submit it is because of the limitations of written conversation over
    face to face communication. This is the bane of email.

    And for those of you who feel personally attacked by this message, THAT is
    the problem as I am speaking in general. I will not contribute in any
    way to this conversation from now on.

    Choose to stay or leave. Period. Let the list owner quietly mention when
    he thinks something is off-topic and then take it private WITH NO HURT
    FEELINGS, FOR PETES SAKE, and this list might get back to what it is.

    I choose to stay, but will stay out of this conversation. Katie is right.
    From the tone of this, it sounds like there are brawls at every dark site.
    I and ALL OF YOU know this is exactly the opposite of what really occurs.

    GOOD GRIEF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ---------
    Phil Chambers [ptchamb@No-Spam] (S.F. Bay Area - Calif. USA)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 30 2001 - 12:12:20 MST

    The Astronomy Connection -- Mailing List Archives