>--- "Rich N." <RNAPO@No-Spam> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> It sounds like you are saying, "Screw you guys. I'm
>> going to do what I want." That's always nice to
>hear from someone relatively new to the list.
>>
>> Rich
>
>I don't know if I'd go that far, but the point is
>well-taken. Even a couple of years ago, when there
>were already about 150 people signed up, the emphasis
>was still on observing and related subject matter; the
>last two years and 20 people have made all the
>difference, so it seems.
>
>For my part, I've been the "listowner" for about 1.5
>years now; when I took over from Mark, the list was
>still pretty solidly observing with only occasional
>forays into photos and equipment and seminars and so
>forth. I was happy to oblige as listonwer for that
>kind of list. The subsequent evolution of the list,
>however, has made it far less attractive for me, to
>the point where I'd rather go back to the "bigdog" or
>similar approach where it's just observing. The
>breadth of discussions on TAC is getting wide enough,
>so that my interest level is now so low as to make it
>almost not worthwhile. If TAC continues to "evolve"
>away from observing and related, I will ask someone
>else to "own" the list...
>
>...not a job for the faint of heart - right, Rich? ;-)
>
>Bruce Jensen
Hi Bruce,
I don't mind the TAC list being open to chit chat. There is always
BDOG for people wanting a more "serious" list. I just don't like the
attitude.
Rich
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 30 2001 - 10:54:12 MST