Re: Long response to "TAC general BA astro or..."

From: Rich N. (RNAPO@No-Spam)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2001 - 09:56:17 MST

  • Next message: E. Ayres: "Re: GT-one and vixen"

    Hi Richard,

    It sounds like you are saying, "Screw you guys. I'm going to
    do what I want." That's always nice to hear from someone
    relatively new to the list.

    Rich

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Richard Crisp <rdcrisp@No-Spam>
    To: sf-bay-tac@No-Spam <sf-bay-tac@seds.org>
    Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:57 AM
    Subject: Re: [TAC] Long response to "TAC general BA astro or..."

    >
    >Sterngold wrote:
    >
    >> 2) The issue of image postings had been discussed here on TAC a year or
    so
    >> earlier, and a consensus reached. I had hoped to avoid a full-scale
    >> replication of that earlier lengthy discussion. The intent was to avoid
    >the
    >> creation of a large volume of traffic, either in image postings or in a
    >> discussion of image postings. That objective was not met. <g>
    >
    >
    >Let's be clear here: I have not posted any image links since the suggestion
    >was made, I actually like the suggestion. I just brought up the fact that I
    >had posted links seemed to generate a lot of traffic. Also let's not forget
    >that a year ago I didn't even own a telescope, nor had I even been thinking
    >of buying one.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 30 2001 - 09:56:50 MST


    The Astronomy Connection -- Mailing List Archives